Ay caramba! Is ‘The Simpsons’ really racist? Consider ‘The Problem With Apu’

When I very first listened to the premise of the documentary “The Difficulty With Apu,” I snorted derisively. What? “The Simpsons” is racist? Kwik-E-Mart operator Apu Nahasapeemapetilon is a stereotype that strays into minstrel-show territory? I was not purchasing it.

Then I viewed comedian Hari Kondabolu’s documentary, which airs Sunday night time on truTV … and I was convinced. “The Simpsons” is racist. Apu — a South Asian voiced/mocked by a white man — is offensive.

Kondabolu, the son of immigrants from India, will make all those points quite evidently in “The Trouble With Apu,” which is thought-provoking and entertaining.

For virtually 28 several years, each and every American child of South Asian descent has been called “Apu.” Has frequently read the phrase “Thank you, arrive all over again,” done in a poor Indian accent. Has been “haunted” by Apu, Kondabolu states in the documentary. “Why? It is amusing for the reason that it’s racist.”

And Apu is voiced by Hank Azaria, “a white male accomplishing an impact of a white male making fun of my father,” Kondabolu adds.

At occasions, he allows his genuine annoyance present. But, for the most portion, it is completed with a perception of humor.

Search man, I don’t detest ‘The Simpsons,’” Kondabolu says. But not every person agrees.

I hate Apu,” states actor Kal Penn, stating Apu is a “brownface” insult.

Component of “The Trouble With Apu” is that there ended up so several South Asians in the media when the demonstrate premiered, so Apu took on outsized relevance. And, as a consequence, the excuse that “The Simpsons” can make fun of absolutely everyone does not hold up.

Whilst Police Chief Wiggum is a blundering fool, there are hundreds of other, diversified representations of police in the media. Apu was pretty much it for South Asians.

ON Tv set

• “The Trouble With Apu” premieres Sunday on truTV — 8 p.m. on DirecTV and Dish 11 p.m. on Comcast.

This one particular character developed so lots of difficulties — psychologically, emotionally — for so numerous individuals,” claims Utkarsh Ambudkar (“Pitch Perfect”). “They didn’t suggest for it to come about, we just were being underrepresented.”

Kondabolu interviews Aziz Ansari, Sakina Jaffrey, Aasif Mandvi, Ajay Naidu, Maulik Pancholy, comedian Russell Peters and former U.S. Surgeon Basic Vivek Murthy, and they’ve all experienced poor experiences involving Apu.

Azaria does not will come out of this looking good. He refused to do an interview for the documentary. And there’s a clip of him declaring that the show’s producers requested him, “Can you do an Indian voice and how offensive can you make it?”

But the initially time Apu appeared in a script he was shown as just “Clerk,” and the author insists he specified the character was not South Asian. Azaria did the amusing voice the (non-Asian) writers and producers laughed and Apu was born.

Kondabolu interviews Dana Gould, a “Simpsons” writer/co-government producer from 2001-08, who argues the writers just go for laughs. He claims that humor “comes out of conflict” and “aspects of our personalities that we’re probably not so happy of.”

But you can see in his eyes he knows he’s made a slip-up when Kondabolu asks what Apu’s flaw is.

I would not say he was flawed,” Gould backtracks, “but he was a initial-generation immigrant.”

”Mocking initial-generation immigrants is humorous/racist” is the clear implication.

One particular factor men and women never comprehend is that one thing can be seriously humorous, and even now completely wrong,” Kondabolu claims. “Or morally questionable.”

At this point, what can you do? Apu has appeared in additional than 60 episodes, and Fox is not going to pull all those out of circulation.

Need to Apu be retired? Need to he be modified? Would he be much less funny if he is?

Kondabolu raises some troubling thoughts. I’ll in no way be in a position to enjoy “The Simpsons” without contemplating about this all over again.

Morrissey Defends Kevin Spacey: “One Wonders If The Boy Did Not Know What Would Happen”

Morrissey is becoming criticized for reviews defending Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey from accusations of sexual harassment and assault.

The former Smiths frontman advised German journal Der Spiegel he thinks Anthony Rapp realized what he was acquiring into.

Xavi Torrent/Redferns via Getty Photos

“As far as I know, he was in a bedroom with a 14-year-previous. Kevin Spacey was 26, boy 14,” he claimed. “One wonders if the boy did not know what would come about. I do not know about you, but in my youth I have in no way been in situations like this,” he ongoing. “Never. I was generally informed of what could happen. When you are in somebody’s bed room, you have to be aware of where that can guide to. Which is why it does not sound quite credible to me. It seems to me that Spacey has been attacked unnecessarily.”

Considering the fact that Rapp arrived ahead in October, other actors have accused Spacey, and some 20 individuals manufactured grievances about unbecoming habits when Spacey was inventive director of London’s Aged Vic Theater.

Earl Gibson III/Getty Illustrations or photos

Morrissey also arrived to the defense of studio head Harvey Weinstein, whose been accused by dozen of girls.

“People know precisely what is likely on,” he supplied. “And they engage in alongside. Afterwards, they come to feel embarrassed or disliked. And then they change it all over and say: ’I was attacked, I was surprised’. But if everything went nicely, and if it had supplied them a excellent vocation, they would not discuss about it.”

The singer clarified that he condemned sexual violence, but mentioned in some situations its just a scenario of bitter grapes.

“I dislike rape. I detest assaults. I detest sexual situations that are pressured on someone. But in numerous cases a single looks at the instances and thinks that the human being who is regarded a target is basically dissatisfied.”

Editor in Chief of NewNowNext. Comedian book enthusiast. Bounder and cad.


Lena Dunham sorry for timing of statement backing ‘Girls’ writer accused of sexual assault

Lena Dunham is apologizing large time. But will it be ample?

The creator and star of HBO’s Women regrets owning weighed in on a scenario involving her close friend and series writer Murray Miller, who is accused of sexual assault.

Just after actress Aurora Perrineau on Friday went to law enforcement to accuse Miller of committing sexual assault in 2012, Dunham and government producer Jenni Konner issued a statement Friday in support of Miller. 

Their primary assertion referred to the recent wave of reviews of sexual assault and misconduct in Hollywood and praises ladies for speaking out about their activities. Then Dunham and Konner cast question on accusations built by Perrineau, the daughter of actor Harold Perrineau (Dropped, Claws), in opposition to their colleague.

It study:  “But during every single time of transform there are also incidences of the society, in its enthusiasm and zeal, using down the completely wrong targets. We consider, obtaining worked carefully with him for far more than half a decade, that this is the situation with Murray Miller. Though our to start with intuition is to hear to just about every woman’s story, our insider expertise of Murray’s scenario can make us self-assured that regrettably this accusation is just one of the 3% of assault circumstances that are misreported every single yr.”

The assertion concluded: “We stand by Murray and this is all we’ll be indicating about this concern.”

But by Saturday night, Dunham was expressing regret: About the timing of the assertion of assistance.

The star, an activist who is normally outspoken on social media about women’s concerns, posted a message of apology on Twitter

“I naively thought it was vital to share my point of view on my friend’s situation as it has transpired behind the scenes around the previous couple months. I now have an understanding of that it was completely the completely wrong time to occur ahead with this sort of a assertion and I am so sorry,”

Dunham continued: “We have been offered the reward of powerful voices and by talking out we had been putting our thumb on the scale and it was mistaken. We regret this decision with each individual fiber to our being.”

The information concluded: ““Every woman who comes forward deserves to be read, fully and wholly, and our romance to the accused should not be section of the calculation anybody makes when inspecting her scenario. … We apologize to any female who have been unhappy.”

Reaction was swift. Actress Haley Ramm (Chasing Lifestyle, Mistresses, Notorious) wrote, “A best instance of saying sorry just to say sorry. Far too late..colors have been proven, babe.”

What We Lose creator Zinzi Clemmons introduced on social media early Sunday that she would quit composing for Dunham’s weekly on the web newsletter, Lenny Letter. And mentioned, “It is time for gals of color — black girls in individual — to divest from Lena Dunham.”

In a prolonged Facebook article, Clemmons wrote, “As a outcome of Lena Dunham’s statements, I have made the decision that I will no longer produce for Lenny Letter. For all you writers who are outraged about what she did, I encourage you to do the very same. Primarily women of all ages of shade. She can not have our text if she can’t respect us. To eliminate any question, I know specifically who Lena Dunham is — who she was before she was well known —and have for decades.”

Clemmons is Dunham’s modern and wrote that she understood Dunham’s circle in higher education. The author claims that they had mutual close friends and goes on to describe her encounters with some of them. 

About quitting Lenny, Clemmons wrote, “I had one particular reservation in this decision, and that is that there are quite a few incredible women who operate for Lenny, two of whom have supported my function with these kinds of selfless treatment. I would apologize to them for this decision, but I’m not accomplishing that anymore. Their boss betrayed them by her actions, and it was wrong for her to make them select among their authors and supporting their boss. They deserve so significantly far better.”

She concluded: “Let’s keep Lena accountable, and to me that usually means sacrificing some comfort and a tiny little bit of funds, in this minute.”

If you have at any time knowledgeable or witnessed sexual misconduct even though performing in the enjoyment field, we’d like to listen to from you. Ship us a secure tip employing the directions at newstips.usatoday.com.


Read through or Share this tale: https://usat.ly/2ixH4ZN

Watch Eminem Deliver Three-Song Medley on ‘SNL’

Eminem delivered a 9-moment, three-track medley all through his Saturday Night time Dwell musical guest place, doing new solitary “Stroll on H2o,” “Stan” and “Love the Way You Lie.”

On all 3 tracks, singer Skyler Grey stuffed in for each and every track’s respective guest – Beyoncé, Dido and Rihanna – even though also playing piano for “Walk on Water.” Eminem and Gray were also backed by a string section and band.

Adhering to the whole rendition of “Stroll on H2o” – which closes with the lyrics “I am godlike / Me and you are not alike / Bitch, I wrote ‘Stan'” – the rapper segued into that Marshall Mathers LP hit in advance of closing out the medley with a couple verses from “Like the Way You Lie.” Both equally “Wander on Drinking water” and “Appreciate the Way You Lie” had been co-penned by Grey.

Bypassing the regular two-phase SNL musical guest format, the medley served as Eminem’s whole effectiveness on the Possibility the Rapper-hosted episode.

Eminem and Gray formerly debuted the stay “Wander on H2o” at the MTV European Audio Awards. The one is predicted to appear on Eminem’s impending album, rumored to be titled Revival.

American Music Awards 2017: Nominees and Winners

Tracee Ellis Ross 2017 American Music Awards
Tracee Ellis Ross attends the 2017 American Audio Awards Push Day at Microsoft Theater on November 16, 2017 in Los Angeles, California. Frederick M. Brown/Getty Visuals

Audio supporters are receiving their say! The American Songs Awards will rejoice the ideal and most influential artists on Sunday, November 19, as selected by the general public.

The AMAs’ 45th annual celebration, to be held at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles, will be hosted by Black-ish star Tracee Ellis Ross, with presenters which include This Is Us stars Chrissy Metz and Justin Hartley, Jared Leto, Jenna Dewan Tatum, Lea Michele and a lot of others. Performers will include Christina Aguilera, Kelly Clarkson, Pink, Selena Gomez, and others.

Bruno Mars potential customers in nominations, with a whole of eight nods in classes that span from Artist of the 12 months to Video clip of the Yr and Preferred Artist. Drake and Ed Sheeran are correct driving him with five nominations just about every.

See the completely listing of nominees down below, and refresh this site after the display commences on ABC Sunday at 8 p.m. ET to uncover out which artists are triumphant!

Artist of the Yr
Bruno Mars
The Chainsmokers
Kendrick Lamar
Ed Sheeran

New Artist of the Calendar year
James Arthur
Niall Horan
Julia Michaels
Put up Malone
Rae Sremmurd

Collaboration of the Year
“Closer” — The Chainsmokers featuring Halsey
“I’m the One” — DJ Khaled that includes Justin Bieber, Quavo, Prospect the Rapper and Lil Wayne
“Despacito” — Luis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee that includes Justin Bieber
“Don’t Wanna Know” — Maroon 5 that includes Kendrick Lamar
“Starboy” — The Weeknd featuring Daft Punk

Tour of the 12 months
Garth Brooks

Video clip of the Year
“That’s What I Like” — Bruno Mars
“Despacito” — Luis Fonsi showcasing Daddy Yankee
“Shape of You” — Ed Sheeran

Favored Male Artist: Pop/Rock
Bruno Mars
Ed Sheeran

Favourite Feminine Artist: Pop/Rock
Alessia Cara
Girl Gaga

Preferred Duo or Team: Pop/Rock
The Chainsmokers
Envision Dragons

Preferred Album: Pop/Rock
Bruno Mars — 24K Magic
Drake — Much more Existence
The Weekend — Starboy

Favourite Music: Pop/Rock
“Closer” — The Chainsmokers showcasing Halsey
“Despacito” — Louis Fonsi and Daddy Yankee showcasing Justin Bieber
“Shape of You” — Ed Sheeran

Beloved Male Artist: Region
Sam Hunt
Thomas Rhett
Keith City

Beloved Woman Artist: State
Miranda Lambert
Maren Morris
Carrie Underwood

Preferred Duo or Group: Country
Florida Ga Line
Minor Major City
Old Dominion

Favorite Album: Place
Jason Aldean — They Don’t Know
Chris Stapleton — From a Place: Volume 1
Keith City — Ripcord

Favored Tune: Country
“Body Like a Again Road” — Sam Hunt
“Dirt on My Boots” — Jon Pardi
“Blue Ain’t Your Color” — Keith Urban

Favorite Artist: Rap/Hip-Hop
Kendrick Lamar

Beloved Album: Rap/Hip-Hop
Drake — Extra Daily life
Kendrick Lamar — DAMN.
Migos — Lifestyle

Favored Tune: Rap/Hip-Hop
“I’m the One” — DJ Khaled that includes Justin Bieber, Quavo, Probability the Rapper and Lil Wayne
“HUMBLE” — Kendrick Lamar
“Black Beatles” — Rae Sremmurd showcasing Gucci Mane

Beloved Male Artist: Soul/R&B
Bruno Mars
Childish Gambino
The Weeknd

Beloved Feminine Artist: Soul/R&B

Favourite Album: Soul/R&B
Bruno Mars — 24K Magic
Childish Gambino — Awaken, My Adore!
The Weeknd — Starboy

Favored Track: Soul/R&B
“That’s What I Like” — Bruno Mars
“Location” — Khalid
“Starboy” — The Weeknd

Favorite Artist: Different Rock
Envision Dragons
Linkin Park
twenty one pilots

Favorit Artist: Grownup Modern day
Bruno Mars
Shawn Mendes
Ed Sheeran

Preferred Artist: Latin
Daddy Yankee
Luis Fonsi

Preferred Artist: Modern Inspirational
Lauren Daigle
Chris Tomlin

Favored Artist: Electronic Dance Songs
The Chainsmokers
DJ Snake
Calvin Harris

Top rated Soundtrack
Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol 2: Great Blend Vol. 2

Indicator up now for the Us Weekly e-newsletter to get breaking superstar news, sizzling photos and extra delivered straight to your inbox!

Want stories like these sent straight to your mobile phone?
Obtain the

Us Weekly Apple iphone app now!

‘Justice League’: Why Can’t Anyone Get Superman Right?

[Warning: This story contains spoilers for Justice League]

The actuality that Superman has to appear back again from the useless in purchase to be humanized in dire superhero blockbuster Justice League says a large amount about the film’s misconceived combination of Frank Miller Lite-fashion gloominess, and co-screenwriter (and fill-in director) Joss Whedon’s signature quippy humor. This film, like so lots of other tales involving Superman, only information its creators’ myopic incapability to properly express the optimism that Superman personifies.

Justice League is, at heart, toxically cynical, even if it does ultimately conclude — not counting its second write-up-credits sequence — on a shaky notice of optimism. In the film, paranoid millionaire turned nocturnal vigilante Bruce “Batman” Wayne (Ben Affleck) assembles a staff of similarly powerful outcasts to defeat a doomsday scenario that, although inherently generic, is a survivalist’s wet aspiration. Demigod-like villain Steppenwolf (a persona-less computer-created monstrosity voiced by Ciaran Hinds) has invaded Earth, and strategies to remodel it into his property planet of Apokolips (even though his native world isn’t named in the movie). Unfortunately for Batman, Clark “Superman” Kent (Henry Cavill) died preventing Doomsday at the finish of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Diana “Wonder Woman” Prince (Gal Gadot), the closest thing that the film has to a Superman-like leader, unfortunately takes a backseat though insecure teammates Arthur “Aquaman” Curry (Jason Momoa), Barry “The Flash” Allen (Ezra Miller), and Victor “Cyborg” Stone (Ray Fisher), muscle mass her out of the highlight.

Surprise Woman’s diminished position claims a ton about Justice League. Speculate Woman’s position was supposedly beefed up during reshoots just after her solo film’s unprecedented, and understandable success. But you cannot actually convey to dependent on the negligible support position she performs (more on this soon). 

Justice League‘s weak job for Wonder Lady is also not surprising given a sample proven by decades of DC Comics films and Television set displays: no one appreciates what to do with Superman, arguably the most iconic superhero to be outlined by his idealism. This imaginative handicap isn’t a single that completely defined trainwreck hard cash-in sequels Superman III  (1983) and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987) had: even Superman Returns (2006), the closest detail to a good Superman film we have found in a when, was an uneasy blend of pseudo-contemplative bathos, and kitschy retro humanism.

Fan-favorite creator Bruce Timm, one of the key showrunners on the usually leading-notch ’90s cartoon Superman: The Animated Collection, also candidly admitted in an interview with Modern-day Masters that he is let down that his variation of the character ultimately reflected an unproductive want to convert sunny Superman into Byronic Batman. That self-lacerating criticism is additional relevant to Person of Steel (2013) and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016), two films that attempt to make Superman approachable by providing him a canned tragedy — his father acquired sucked up by a twister simply because…he advised Superman to keep on the down-lower? Huh? — and then ultimately murdering him in a strange homage to “The Loss of life of Superman,” a person of the most highly publicized, but retrospectively unpopular comics functions of the ’90s (if you want a snicker: got to your nearby comics store, and check with the proprietor how several copies of the “Funeral for a Buddy” sequel tie-ins he’s still got in stock). No matter what transpired to the “Gentleman of Tomorrow,” an legendary character that the Comics Journal’s Tom Crippen once devastatingly put down as “a childish hood ornament atop a fake-serious market,” and “the appendix of the superhero genre, a tremendous-appendix that is as major as a spine and completely inoperable?”

If anything at all, Justice League reflects the lengthy-established Batman-ification of the superhero entire world. Like the Caped Crusader, several customers of the title group are described by pseudo-tragic backstories that are related through leaden expository dialogue peppered with eye-roll-inducing Whedon-style one-liners. Aquaman’s cursing, consuming, and generally surly habits — which are undercut in a scene the place Speculate Woman’s lasso of fact unconvincingly reveals him to be a major softy — are excused by a dark past involving a throne he’s turned his back on, and an Atlantean mom he resents for obtaining deserted him. The Flash’s social awkwardness — appropriate down to Rain Man-worthy complaints about “reduced blood sugar,” his teammates’ preference for Irish goodbyes, and his gnawing dread that he is not actually running “East” — is an oblique result of his slavish commitment to father Henry Allen (Billy Crudup), a wrongfully convicted prisoner. Cyborg’s out-of-regulate powers — which only go berserk in a scene exactly where Superman returns from the grave, thus provoking a contrived brawl — make him experience extra like a Frankenstein’s-monster-style freak, irrespective of the good lengths that his super-scientist father Silas Stone (Joe Morton) went to help save him using only tacky, Michael-Bay’s-Transformers-looking robotic components.

The only main character who is not outlined solely by a darkish previous is Speculate Girl, and she will not lead a lot to the film’s plot beyond using her reality lasso, and obscure ability to inspire her teammates…from afar. Surprise Woman, a God-like heroine, is similar to Superman in that she’s “aged-fashioned,” as she puts it. So Question Woman recruits, but under no circumstances sales opportunities.

How could she when Batman, an fundamentally flamboyant character whose tragic earlier has eventually appear to outline his many modern-day incarnations, has turn out to be such an emblematically schizoid figurehead? He helps make uncharacteristic jokes, like when he winces that “[some of my body parts are] undoubtedly bleeding” or when he smirks that his authentic tremendous-electric power is, “I am abundant,” mainly to give audiences’ a respite from his implicitly character-defining doomsaying. But these jokes reveal a basic concern that viewers will tune out if a character who runs about in a Bat-costume, and assaults flying demon-monsters with a robotic spider, and a flying Bat-shaped plane — both of which are armed with missiles and/or guns — would not wink at them adequate to acknowledge how absurd he appears to be.

Put it this way: do you remember the leather jackets that the mutant heroes wore in X-Guys (2000), and its very first first sequels? These costumes were presented as a normal-viewers-pleasant alternative to the characters’ signature primary-coloration uniforms. Now consider if the X-Adult men‘s jet-black jackets were being reversible, and had pastel yellows and blues. That’s Batman in Justice League: he is possibly attempting way too difficult to fit his new creators’ have to have to lighten him up, or he’s (briefly) trying way too really hard to establish the film’s dour pseudo-universal thematic stakes by referring to Superman as “the alien,” and chatting about a mysterious “contingency [plan]” in scenario Superman arrives again from the dead without having a “soul.”

One are unable to assistance but roll their eyes through scenes where Batman has to act hopeful, and baldly propose that Superman is as symbolically critical as District Attorney turned horribly maimed baddy Harvey “Two-Experience” Dent (Aaron Eckhart) is to Batman in The Darkish Knight (2008). In Justice League, Batman briefly admits that he admires Superman, and even suggests he’s not as “human” as Huge Blue. But Batman’s speaking factors come out of nowhere, and feel to belong in a cheerier movie. His conversion from a dread junkie to a cautious idealist ought to be a major concentrate of Justice League. But dialogue about his hero worship only feels like lip company to good beliefs that Justice League‘s creators will not know how to properly dramatize.

So it can be no wonder that Superman will not get to do a great deal in this film. He will come back again from the lifeless like an evil Jesus Christ, and only regains his humanity after he reconnects with Lois Lane (Amy Adams), and his parents’ farm. Maybe he must have stayed six toes beneath. 

To be reasonable: it’s not impossible to get Superman proper. Timm’s self-crucial remark applies specially to Superman’s Batman-y villains. But Superman: The Animated Collection is arguably the best modern, quasi-mainstream adaptation of the character. In that present, the strategy of a God who was elevated as a guy helps make perception. He was elevated to be humble, so he’s reserved, and principled. He talks to the people he’s rescuing, and does not demolish every single setting up in just eyeshot if he can support it. Timm’s Superman is fallible, and thinks about the repercussions of his steps, but doesn’t waste time agonizing about his previous blunders. He also has a local community of allies, and detractors who make feeling provided the type of person he is: they are either drawn to, or resent the case in point he sets. Greatest of all: Superman: The Animated Collection is, like Batman: The Animated Collection, an remarkable kids’ show. Its’ creators by no means belabored their heroes’ shallow psychological motives, and nevertheless were often able to arrive up with humorous, dynamic, and thoughtful character-driven stories for both children and grownups. 

Which sadly provides us back again to Justice League. It’s disappointing to see Superman hyped up as an inspiration for his peers without ever being observably inspiring. He’s nevertheless addressed like an unidentified quantity, and is only superficially humanized through martyrdom, at which place he someway gets an unqualified — and frequently undefined — symbol of hope. This knowledge of the character (pardon the pun) flies immediately in the face of the suspicion and panic he brought on in both Male of Metal and Batman v Superman

Justice League‘s model of Superman doesn’t even make sense inside of the film. He’s a image of freedom, Okay. But why is he “additional human” than Batman? Just isn’t Batman ostensibly humanized by his weaknesses, as expressed by his complicated, morbidly self-deprecating perception of humor? Which is he: a fallible loaded child who is worried of alter, or a wary believer in Superman as a drive of improve? If Superman can’t be a key character in Justice League, why cannot his character at minimum be understood by way of his colleagues’ actions? If this most recent outing is any indicator, then Crippen is correct: Superman is simultaneously as well critical to be taken out, but also way too insubstantial to be left in.